Three 3D Printing Companies Sanctioned by the USA for Exports to China

On Wednesday, the U.S. Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued a Temporary Denial Order (TDO) to suspend the export privileges of three US-based 3D printing service providers. Quicksilver Manufacturing Inc, Rapid Cut LLC and U.S. Prototype Inc. are all based in Wilmington, North Carolina and use the same mailing address. The TDO was issued due to the companies sharing blueprints and technical drawings to 3D print satellite, rocket and defense-related prototypes with Chinese companies which the BIS has identified as a security risk thus justifying the sanctioning of these 3D printing companies.

As noted in the statement released by the BIS, TDOs are some of the most significant civil sanctions that the Chamber of Commerce can issue, showing the severity of this particular case. Essentially, now, over a 180-day period, the companies will not be able to export from the United States nor receive or participate in any exports from the country. The decision is strongly linked to issues with international relations, as an example other recent sanctions have included those to Russian companies as a direct response to the Russian Invasion of Ukraine.

3D printing is increasingly being used in defense applications (photo credits: ICON)

In this specific case, the Temporary Denial Order was issued because the companies are suspected of “exporting or causing the export from the United States of controlled technology to China for 3D printing without the required U.S. government authorization.” The Office of Export Enforcement (OEE) was alerted to this violation by an unnamed U.S. aerospace and global defense technology company who reported the export-control violation in sending controlled satellite technology to China. Discussing the reasoning behind the decision, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement Matthew S. Axelrod commented, “Outsourcing 3D printing of space and defense prototypes to China harms U.S. national security. By sending their customers’ technical drawing and blueprints to China, these companies may have saved a few bucks — but they did so at the collective expense of protecting U.S. military technology.”